Wednesday, 15 March 2017

Continued professional development a better indicator of a good numeracy teacher than a qualification

The title says it all. A qualification is great... but it does not compare with ongoing professional development when it comes to improving tutor performance.  This finding is consistent - from Li Ping Ma to Diana Coben to Bass, Ball and Hill.

For example, note this comment from Sheila Macrae, taken from Diana Coben's (2003) review of Adult Numeracy provision:

The findings also raised questions about the sort of mathematical knowledge needed by
teachers in order to be effective. Contrary perhaps to expectations, being a highly effective
teacher was not positively correlated with high levels of mathematical qualifications, a finding supported, as noted above, by Begle’s research in the USA (Begle, 1979). Instead, the amount of continuing professional development in mathematics education undertaken by teachers was a better predictor of their effectiveness.

Here's my thought.  Educators are in the business of educating.  Therefore, an educator must be a master of learning, and that means committing themselves to ongoing learning. Imagine being taught to drive by someone who didn't drive.  There are things you can only learn about mathematics by actually learning mathematics.

Do note however, that the evidence does NOT diminish qualifications. A person with a qualification still outperforms one without (in general).

If you are teaching maths or literacy, the best thing you can do is to start to study.  It will absolutely reinvigorate your teaching.  It'll make you better, and it'll make your learners better.  


  1. And if you do want to do a qualification, the NCALNE (Voc) is now out of date and expiring along with unit standard 21204.

    Instead, check out the new version - the NZCALNE (Voc). Better, more streamlined with lower carbs, better abs, and a free set of steak knives.